Skip to content

Chicago Mayor Daley, The Last Hurrah!

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley has announced that he will not seek re-election next year.  I’m OK with that.  I think that Chicago needs a new mayor and a separate professional CEO to run the City.  The Mayor will be the politician, the public figure and let a city manager who is an absolute professional CEO run the city.  Will this work?  Probably not unless the people want it to and refuse to allow more of the same.

There are lots of very dedicated people working for the city committed to do the right things in their respective jobs and departments that are thwarted by politics, special interests, and what’s in it for me attitudes by others.  A real business manager who can manage and hire, fire and maintain financial integrity when allowed to do so is what is needed.

How many corporations on the brink of disaster have brought in a professional manager, a CEO at the highest level of understanding of what is needed and with the support to make it happen?

Will it be painful to many, absolutely.  Politics as usual may have to go and the 50 aldermen (and women) need to make choices.  Like congress a whole lot of people are going to be recycled because business as usual is not what people want any more.

Chicago is a great city and Daley like his father has done a lot of things that have really made a difference.  But there is more to be done and much that needs to stop happening.  Politics is not about jobs, bigger spending, nepotism and paying for votes with contracts for work and  for campaign contributions.

I support a Chief Executive Officer to take charge of day to day affairs and put some common sense back into the process.

What Were They Thinking – Part 1

One of my favorite reading activity stems from articles that I come across periodically that exhibit some outrageous, obnoxious or ridiculous actions and decisions made by someone in charge, whether a key employee in a company or government agency or a top level official in an organization.

I will report these to offer my perspective so that smart CEOs will see these choices and decisions for what they are and ask themselves: What were they thinking?

The purpose is to help point out the need for all senior executives and especially the CEO to make sure that these types of things never happen on their watch.

Here is an example from a recent Chicago Sun Times “The Fixer “Column”.

A reader writes about his wife’s experience with buying a golf lessons gift certificate from the golf pro at a Dick’s Store last Christmas.

It seems that the golf pro scammed the women in that he worked in the store but had the shopper make her check out to him personally and when golf season came around and it was time to use the certificate the golfer called Dick’s to arrange for the lessons only to be told that in fact the golf pro scammed her.  The golf pro had worked this arrangement on several other customers.

When asked if Dick’s was going to fix this, the golfer was told “No”.  You heard right “No”.

I am amazed that Dick’s would not stand behind this problem.  Only after the newspaper columnist talked to Dick’s corporate people did they offer to make a partial resolution.

In the days of the new media and viral internet messaging you would think that the overwhelming sense of corporate America today is to do the right thing in these kind of customer issues and that the public relations value means more than the cost of bad publicity.

I would argue that the days of the “lemon” car or bad service or any bad experience can no longer be afforded, as Toyota just found out.  Do something stupid, ridiculous or contrary to common sense and the world will know about it as soon as the unhappy person hits the last key on their blog post, or website post.

The next time common sense is tempted to go out the window, think of the damage that can be done to your company or organizational reputation and make a risk analysis and cost-benefit assessment.

For $100 Dick’s could have avoided a whole lot of negative publicity.  I for one am not motivated to go to Dick’s when I have other choices for my shopping needs.

CEOs Who Manage Physical Risk Favored By Wall Street and Balance Sheet

One of the least favorite concerns of CEOs is the management of physical risk.  I have been promoting the protection of shareholder value by managing business risks, especially from catastrophes for years.  The assets needed to be expended both in terms of time and money are usually discretionary, optional and often low in priority beyond data recovery.

A new study recently released confirms that companies with strong physical risk management programs will deliver more stable earnings.  The report from FM Global (FM Global Risk/Earnings Ratio Study) concludes the significant differences that result between large businesses with weak risk management programs as compared to companies with a high degree of focus on risk management after an event.

Example: a fire loss, according to the study, are four times more costly.  The risks from natural disasters are estimated at 29 times greater.

These conclusions are not new.  There have been previous studies looking at shareholder value before and after losses and the degree of preparedness necessary to minimize those losses.

The basic issue is, however not so much the management of risk reducing economic impact but CEOs that order a thorough analysis of risk of a true business nature will uncover weaknesses in the organization far beyond the intended results.  An analysis of a company’s basic fiber and structure from all aspects of its existence and it place in the global marketplace with uncover weaknesses that could impact the ease in which it will compete and or recover from adversity in the future howsoever it is caused.

I encourage CEOs of any company size to rethink risk at that the fundamental level of business, not just physical but the makeup of the enterprise from the ground up. Tough choices today could cause some very revealing results longterm.

Get Out! Get Out! Everyone Out Now!

These  words were probably uttered thousands of times  September 1st in Silver Spring Maryland when a hostage taker with a gun and explosives took over the lobby of the Discovery Channel headquarters.  While the newsworthiness of this story speaks for itself the overarching issues for people currently in buildings living and working in the areas that were effectively locked down raises a question of assessing the risks that most experts ignore.

Businesses were forced to close if they had the time to do so.  I mention this story because recently I was speaking to a local chapter of an accountants professional society and mentioned one of the concerns they need to deal with as a new reality of life is incidents of workplace violence and that the lack of access to their place of business for a few hours or a day or longer is something that they need to plan for. An unanswered phone in a place of business for hours is a sure sigh of trouble and could drive business elsewhere.

When a fire or flood or hostage situation like this occurs the authorities take over areas substantially larger than one might expect. Small business owners and CEO s of larger companies need to be realistic about the odds of an event occurring in their building or place of business that could cause their employees to evacuate or not be able to go into their business until the situation is resolved, however long that may take.

Too many CEOs delegate disaster planning to IT or HR or finance with out really challenging the assumptions or verifying the completeness of an analysis of risk.  Let the Discovery building incident generate a question as owner or senior executive of your business – What happens if  “What if happens”.  How will we respond and how will we protect our people and our business?   We don’t need more New Orleans type experiences

The Ineffective CEOs of Katrina, New Orleans – 5 Years Later

The results are in. The media, on all the cable and network news reports, did their five-year review of Katrina during the last few days of August this year and continued the “go nowhere” discussion of what went wrong, who did what or who didn’t and why.

Five years ago, “CEO” Ray Nagin, Mayor of New Orleans, “CEO” Kathleen Blanco, Governor of Louisiana, “CEO” Mike Brown of FEMA, and others showed the tens of thousands of the “customers” they served, the people of Louisiana, how leadership fails.  As Mike Brown said four days after the storm and the abandonment of any sense of response for help: “We didn’t know how bad it was” or some gibberish that meant the same thing.  How can these people be so stupid?   There must have been an agenda that reflected the lack of response despite the calls for help.

I interviewed General Russell Honore last fall and asked him about the slow response and arrival of the National Guard.  His response was, paraphrasing, hell, it takes time to get all these people and equipment organized and get them in place. I know, General.  I was in the National Guard in the 60′s. I know how long it takes. But we were prepared.  One phone call tree and people responded, showed up and were ready to execute their mission in hours, not days.  I got a call at three in the afternoon to report for duty and was ready to hit the streets by 9 PM with my unit.

Looking at the video and the reports, the anguish and pain and death five years after Katrina, you can only ask yourself why and how it was so possible to have such failure.  It has always been said that if only government ran like some businesses.

But even the best CEOs seem to fail at preparing for disaster.  Time and again, after flooding, hurricanes, and other natural disasters, we see the numbers of businesses that fail or take months to rebuild and then fail.  If we could only bottle up common sense and offer it to more people in response to one question:  What are you prepared to do when “what if” happens?

See the next post for an example and ask yourself if you are a smart CEO who challenges your assumptions about your business readiness for unforeseen risks.

How Not to Lead: British Pandemonium (BP) and the Tony Hayward “Stupid Is As Stupid Does Show”!


There were three fundamental missteps made by the BP executive leadership, especially Tony Hayward in the Horizon Rig/BP catastrophe. These are excellent examples of “more of the same” disastrous management style that has become so well known in the past few years in corporate America and now the UK.

This was despite all the efforts to show how hard BP was “working the problems” of leaks and the resultant pollution while promoting their concern and trying to make things right. There have been dozens of interviews and articles from pundits, professors and politicians all claiming to promote their views of the critical mistakes made and to provide leadership tips of what not to do in a corporate, environmental or economic crisis. At the end of the day three critical factors seem to prop up all the others.

1. Fail to Plan and Failure to Test Safety Procedures:

First, as a disaster preparedness expert, I know that scenario planning is one of the best tools available to create the necessary response when faced with a crisis event whether it is natural or manmade. Maybe better planning and testing, by focusing on any safety flaws and shortcuts to safety that may have existed, might have prevented the explosion.

It appears that they failed to properly plan for a disaster or even test the plan they had. One report indicated that the BP disaster plan for the gulf region failed to mention the words “hurricane” or “tropical storm” in their 582-page plan for the gulf.  This failure to plan properly is a failure in leadership that goes to the core of the entire enterprise and the core function of a CEO – to be the visionary and part of that job function is to anticipate how the enterprise could be affected by a catastrophe and how well the company can respond to successfully save the enterprise and all that is potentially affected and continue operations.

2. Common Sense

Second, BP has scored an “F” in common sense. They just didn’t get it.  They failed to acknowledge their mistakes and tried consistently to cover them up. (Were the fire alarm systems on the oil rig really turned off so that sleeping workers would not be disturbed by false alarms or drills?)

By thwarting media access, flyovers and other methods to gain information, they withheld the real stories of the explosion and their efforts to both stop the leak and direct cleanups efforts.

They treated the local population and its desire to help as intruders. Experts from all over the world were capable of providing insights, ideas and equipment and expertise to help in the cleanup efforts.  Companies and their employees were standing by offering assistance and not acknowledged.

3.  Indifference

Third, as a peer-level advisor to mid-market CEOs, I can tell you that BP, its executive leadership and its board of directors, failed to connect with the people most affected; the families of the deceased. That should have been the real story but it was buried in favor of the environmental and economic impact stories. This should have been about the people, those who died and those that were left behind as well as the local population affected.

These 3 factors probably contributed more to the failure in leadership than others.

Tony Hayward falls way short of being an “authentic” leader and he clearly doesn’t seem to care much about his company, his employees, their families, or the people impacted by his company, its safety issues or its operations and failures.  Utilizing a brain trust of local and U.S. experts with “clean-up” and “stop leak” ideas was not in the cards for BP.

Properly done, Tony Hayward would not have needed his life back because he never would have lost it. He would have had a plan that was tested, messages that were pre-written, relationships with the media already established, relationships with all the services he would have needed from around the world and the permission and the resources necessary pre-approved to be able to respond. Like a fire department and its personnel – when the bell rings, everyone knows exactly what to do and how. But not a multi-billion dollar corporation like British Pandemonium.

An Open Letter to Major General Stanley McChrystal, USA (Ret.)

General McChrystal:

Now that the dust has settled and the media frenzy is over let’s revisit your actions that caused your recent visit to the “woodshed”

As the “CEO” of the Afghanistan operations you were correct in sharing your thoughts about what you felt was right and what was wrong about the conduct of the war against the Taliban. However, like any CEO you are beholdened to the “Chairman” of the Board as your boss and in this case it was the President.

The word is that you have been crushed by this whole episode and the forced removal of you from your leadership position and ultimate retirement has been understandably rough on you.

Understandable, but like George S Patton or Douglas McArthur their “bosses” also didn’t like the timing of their comments or that fact that they appeared to undermine “policy” which they as soldiers and leaders were supposed to implement. CEOs have to make tough choices and sometimes the greater good is served in the long view.

I don’t fault what you did but your timing could have been better.  Despite that, history will be kind to you and in retrospect two conclusions will arise which should make you feel much better today despite your position on the sidelines.

First, you said what needed to be said and the lack of military and foreign affairs experience by the policy makers will ultimately be in support of your comments.  Secondly, in retrospect you probably did more to bring certain facts to the forefront of thinking that will bring this mess to a successful conclusion while others get credit for it.  In the minds of many you are a 5 Star guy for doing what you did.

My advice for you is to begin to help others learn from these “mistakes” and share the risks that straight talk creates and how to manage them better. CEOs, indeed all executives should heed the following advice: Praise publicly, criticize privately.

Norris Beren

BP Tony Got His Groove Back!

CEO – Chief Excuse Officer

Is it fair to say that politicians over many years, perhaps hundreds of years, have been accused of not being dependable, trustworthy, transparent (I hate that word) and/or honest?

But what about Chief Executive Officers of companies?   While I was growing up in the 50′s to 80′s, CEOs, for the most part, were the pillars of the community.  They were perceived as father figures, honest, dependable, reliable and good corporate citizens.

What has happened?  Now they go bankrupt yet fly in private planes to Congress to ask for money.  They go bankrupt and still give out salaries, bonuses and favors with an absolute right of entitlement, practics that are outrageous.

The tragedy is the large numbers of CEOs that have been caught up in this greed epidemic who don’t look back.  The workers of the world, consumers and taxpayers all, are entitled to better and more respect from these leaders.  Unfortunately, profit and growth at any price has guided the economy during the past twenty years or so.

So now we can build an oil well regardless of oversight, safety concerns or exposure to disaster but with a reckless disregard for consequences.

I mention all this because I caught sound bites of the BP CEO, Tony Hayward, and his unbelievable attempt to say nothing to Congress during his testimony on June 17.  Clearly, he was under wraps to say nothing, often reciting the usual courtroom mantra “I don’t recall.”  What’s even worse is that Congress called upon him knowing that the other branch of government wants to make a criminal case out of BP’s actions.

But even if he could talk, the guy was like a deer in headlights.  No matter the question, he was prepared to say nothing and continue to offer the same lame excuses about what happened, why it happened.  Oh yeah, remember 11 people were killed.  His after action report should say two things.  “There were hundreds of safety violations, so negligence is the root cause of the explosion. Eleven people died and it’s our fault and we will fix the problem and not rest or become distracted by anything while the oil is still leaking and cleanup remains. ” That’s what it should say and that’s what they should do.  Eleven people died, thousands have lost their jobs, income and their businesses, let alone the wildlife and environment that has been killed.  But Tony is on his boat back in England.  He got his life back already!

BP to the Fishermen – “No Records, No Claim”

Commercial fishermen in the Gulf Coast area affected by the oil spill have been told to produce documents to support their claims for compensation for losses suffered: their commercial license, proof of residence and tax papers.

Oops! Tax Papers? Seems that small business owners in that region get paid in cash for their catch. “But how can I pay taxes if everything I earned was in cash,” said one fisherman. Oh, they work in cash only and don’t report the income.

Seems that for generations these small business “CEOs” have been nonconformists and now the rules they have lived by might have caught up with them.

Small business owners who think that they are too small to get noticed and who operate outside of good business practices just don’t realize the long term value of running a business like a business, not a hobby or a cash printing press. This is a mistake that could cost a whole season’s income.

Oil Spill – Obama – Also Too Little, Too Late, Too Slow

“Oil-Gate”  like  “Katrina-Gate” and “Watergate” is quickly becoming another example of  mistakes that CEOs make, even the president of the United States.  With an unlimited supply of experience, wisdom, personnel, and experts available and access to a great deal of money, you would think the U. S. would have had enough foresight to prevent some things from happening.  Is it politics, arrogance, turf wars or campaign contributions that has kept the U.S.  from controlling  the action 5000 feet under the water?

So now we find out about an exemption afforded the drill rig from certain safety controls 10 days before the explosion and the person responsible has been fired (resigned).  What is really going on and why is our “CEO”  saying 37 days into the catastrophe, “I take responsibility”?   He warned that “mistakes are inevitable in a disaster so large”.  For a CEO to say that any large project will have catastrophic results if something initially goes wrong is an outrageous conclusion. CEOs who run companies and  take that position should be run out of town by their board.  The American people are entitled to a better response than hearing that we are doing the best we can.

But this entry is  not about the president or about politics.  The real issue is that CEOs are expected to anticipate problems on their watch and they are supposed to have plans in place to prevent disasters.  The real issue is that even CEOs of the biggest companies and even government can make mistakes.  Are you exempt?

If and when disasters occur, CEOs should be completely prepared to manage them and forthright to admit them.  CEOs don’t get paid for allowing mistakes to happen; they get paid for making sure they don’t.  How about you?  When was the last time your company did a scenario analysis to determine how prepared you are to react and respond to a product or service failure that could make you a front page headline?  Give it some thought!

Learn to avoid the 7 mistakes smart CEOs don’t make – check out my new book – C.H.O.I.C.E.S. available in
July.

NLB